Skip to content
Call Us Today 626-956-3500
Trust Law Partners Logo
  • About
    • Our Firm
    • Meet the Partners
    • Videos
    • Results
    • Blog
    • FAQs
  • Legal Team
    • Mark Russakow
    • Jeffrey Loew
    • Lisa Tan
    • Greg Aslanian
    • Jeffrey Hall
    • Jason Grutter
    • David DePianto
    • Brent Smyth
    • Wayne Dong
    • Matthew Thompson
    • Jeff Liu
    • Jamie L. Ackerman
    • Molly Pitruzzelli
    • Chris Nagakawa
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Compel Distributions
    • Mediation
    • Trustee Defense
    • Trustee Removal
    • Will & Trust Contests
    • Wrongful Disinheritance
    • Inheritance
  • Contact
    • Pasadena
    • San Mateo
    • San Diego
    • Newport Beach
    • Santa Barbara
    • Dallas
  • Search
Get A Free Consultation

Strategic Use of Lis Pendens in Trust Disputes: Lessons from Newell v. Superior Court

  • All Posts
  • Estate Litigation
  • Estate Planning
  • Mediation
  • Trust Litigation
  • Will or Trust Contest
  • Will Trust
  • Wrongful Disinheritance
Deed of Trust document on desk with glasses, pen, and envelope.

Home  >  Blog  >  Strategic Use of Lis Pendens in Trust Disputes: Lessons from Newell v. Superior Court

October 23, 2025 | By Trust Law Partners
Strategic Use of Lis Pendens in Trust Disputes: Lessons from Newell v. Superior Court


In the evolving field of California trust and estate litigation, the recent case of Newell v. Superior Court has clarified a key issue in how litigants can use lis pendens in trust disputes that involve real property. At Trust Law Partners, we are often asked whether recording a lis pendens is a good strategy in contested trust proceedings. The case of Newell has helped give beneficiaries and litigators a more predictable path forward.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

The Facts in Newell

Arthur and Julia Mancini created a family trust in 2002. After Julia passed, Arthur amended the trust to name his caregiver, Neneth Rollins, as both the successor trustee and the sole beneficiary. Following Arthur’s death, Rollins used trust funds to purchase a home in Van Nuys and titled it under her name as trustee of the Mancini Trust.

One of the Mancinis’ children, Lucy Newell, filed a petition contesting the trust amendments and Rollins’ appointment as trustee. Newell’s legal claims included undue influence, fraud, and violations of Probate Code section 21380, which creates a presumption of invalidity when a care custodian is named as a beneficiary. Newell also recorded a lis pendens against the Van Nuys property, seeking to stop any sale or encumbrance during the litigation.

Rollins responded by filing a motion to expunge the lis pendens, arguing that Newell’s petition did not include a valid real property claim. The probate court agreed and ordered the lis pendens removed. Newell then petitioned the California Court of Appeal for relief.

What the Appellate Court Held

Judge holding gavel in courtroom with justice scales on wooden desk.

The appellate court reversed. It found that Newell’s claims did indeed affect title to real property, because if she succeeded, Rollins would be removed as trustee and a new trustee would be appointed. That change in trustee would result in a change in title ownership for the Van Nuys property. The court emphasized that even though the property was held in trust, it was the trustee—not the trust itself—that owned legal title.

This distinction was critical. California law allows a lis pendens when the underlying legal action affects title or the right to possession of real property. The appellate court held that Newell’s petition, by seeking to invalidate trust amendments and remove Rollins as trustee, qualified as a real property claim. Therefore, her lis pendens was appropriate and should not have been expunged.

Why the Case Matters

The Newell case has immediate implications for trust and estate litigation, especially in cases involving real property transfers to caregivers or other non-family members. In the past, some courts have been reluctant to uphold a lis pendens in cases involving trust contests, reasoning that these disputes were more about trust administration than property rights. Newell changes that.

Now, when a trust dispute could result in the removal of a trustee or a reversal of a transfer, and real estate is involved, recording a lis pendens is a valid and strategic step. This helps prevent the wrongful trustee from selling or refinancing the property before the court can rule.

It also gives beneficiaries a stronger legal footing. By asserting a lis pendens, they create a public notice of their claim, which can discourage third-party buyers, lenders, or others from dealing with the property while litigation is pending.

When to Consider Using a Lis Pendens

Lady Justice statue with gavel, legal scales, and stacks of case files on desk.

While Newell has expanded the availability of lis pendens in trust cases, it’s not a one-size-fits-all tool. It should only be used when the outcome of your case would result in a change to legal ownership or possessory rights in real property.

For example, consider using a lis pendens when any of the following circumstances arise:

  • The trust holds real estate, and the current trustee is accused of fraud or undue influence.
  • A beneficiary challenges the validity of a trust amendment that diverts property to someone else.
  • A beneficiary has asserted a claim for a constructive trust over the disputed real property.
  • There is evidence that the trustee plans to sell, encumber, or transfer real property before the litigation concludes.

The Limits of Lis Pendens

It’s also important to understand what a lis pendens can’t do. It won’t stop a trustee from transferring non-real estate assets, nor will it prevent trust administration unrelated to the property. Courts may still expunge a lis pendens if it appears that the petitioner does not have a valid claim affecting title.

Moreover, lis pendens carries its own risks. If the court later determines that the lis pendens was improper, the party who recorded it may be liable for damages. That’s why it’s important to consult with experienced trust litigation counsel before recording one.

How Trust Law Partners Uses This Tool

At Trust Law Partners, we assess lis pendens on a case-by-case basis. We don’t use them casually or reflexively. But when real estate is central to the dispute and the evidence supports a change in ownership or trustee control, we act quickly to protect our clients’ interests.

What Beneficiaries Need to Know

Last will and testament document with pen, eyeglasses, and legal book on desk.

If you are the beneficiary of a trust and discover that trust property is at risk of being sold, gifted, or otherwise moved under questionable circumstances, the lis pendens may be your best legal tool to hit pause.

Too often, family members find out too late that a trustee has transferred away valuable real estate. The courts can reverse those transfers in some situations, but it’s harder when the property has passed into the hands of an innocent third party.

By filing a lis pendens early, you may prevent those transactions before they happen. The public notice also serves as a deterrent to potential buyers and lenders. It signals that there’s active litigation, and the property’s title may not be clean.

Final Takeaway

Newell v. Superior Court confirms what experienced trust litigators have long argued: that trust disputes involving control over real property can and often do affect title in ways that support a lis pendens. This ruling gives beneficiaries and their counsel more confidence to use lis pendens as part of a broader litigation strategy.

But like any powerful tool, it should be used responsibly. At Trust Law Partners, we know how to navigate these high-stakes issues. If your family trust includes real estate and you suspect wrongdoing, don’t wait. Legal options like lis pendens exist for a reason. Let us help you use them wisely and effectively.

For trusted, contingency-based trust litigation support throughout California, contact Trust Law Partners, LLP at 833-982-2079. We know how to hold trustees accountable, and we get results.

SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION

RECENT ARTICLES
  • What’s the Best Way to Protect Myself Legally as a Trustee?

  • What Are the Benefits of Using Mediation For Trust and Estate Disputes?

  • When Attorneys Take from a Trust: Trustee Rights and Lessons from the Steve McQueen Painting Case

  • Mental Capacity in California Trust & Estate Litigation: Why Testing with a Doctor May Make a Difference

  • California’s Anti-Lapse Statute: Probate Code Section 21110 Explained

  • Do You Need to Sign a Will on the Same Day as the Witnesses?

  • What Happens If a Trust Is Signed Without a Notary?

  • Congratulations to Partner Jeff Loew— recognized in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

  • What Is Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR)?

  • What Does Intestate Mean?

Safeguard Your Future with Professional Legal Support

Name(Required)

OUR OFFICES

Locations

 

Pasadena
San Mateo
San Diego
Newport Beach
Santa Barbara
Dallas

Contact us to discuss
your case with our
trusted lawyers.

California probate law is one of the most intricate areas of state law, filled with technical procedures, filing deadlines, and evidentiary burdens. Without legal representation from a professional in this field, it’s easy to overlook key facts, waive important rights, or become entangled in long, frustrating legal processes.

Our Pasadena inheritance lawyers are not just familiar with California probate law—we’re immersed in it. We stay current on legal updates, case law trends, and judicial interpretations. We collaborate as a team to examine every angle of a case and develop the most strategic and effective approach for our clients.

Name(Required)

  • About
  • Legal Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact
  • Search