Skip to content
Call Us Today 626-956-3500
Trust Law Partners Logo
  • About
    • Our Firm
    • Meet the Partners
    • Videos
    • Results
    • Blog
    • FAQs
    • Attorney Referrals
  • Legal Team
    • Jeffrey Loew
    • Mark Russakow
    • Lisa Tan
    • Greg Aslanian
    • Jeffrey Hall
    • Jason Grutter
    • Wayne Dong
    • Jamie L. Ackerman
    • David DePianto
    • Jeff Liu
    • Andrew Nutbrown
    • Brent Smyth
    • Matthew Thompson
    • Evan Chavez
    • Anoush Salmasiyan
    • Sophia Tao
    • Molly Pitruzzelli
    • Stephen Young
  • Practice Areas
    • Compel Distributions
    • Mediation
    • Trustee Defense
    • Trustee Removal
    • Will & Trust Contests
    • Wrongful Disinheritance
  • Contact
    • Pasadena
    • San Mateo
    • San Diego
    • Newport Beach
    • Santa Barbara
    • Dallas
  • Search
Get A Free Consultation

Once, Twice, Three Times an Elder Abuser: Probate Code Section 859 Makes Wrongdoers Pay for Inheritance Theft

  • All Posts
  • Estate Litigation
  • Estate Planning
  • Mediation
  • Trust Litigation
  • Will or Trust Contest
  • Will Trust
  • Wrongful Disinheritance
piggy bank theft inheritance theft

Home  >  Blog  >  Once, Twice, Three Times an Elder Abuser: Probate Code Section 859 Makes Wrongdoers Pay for Inheritance Theft

July 2, 2026 | By Trust Law Partners
Once, Twice, Three Times an Elder Abuser: Probate Code Section 859 Makes Wrongdoers Pay for Inheritance Theft

Inheritance theft is not always obvious at first. A trustee may refuse to turn over account records. A sibling may remove money from a parent’s bank account before death. A caregiver may pressure an elder to sign over property. A family member may hide valuables, transfer title, or claim that assets were “gifted” when no real gift was intended.

In California trust and probate litigation, these cases are often about more than recovering what was taken. When the facts support it, the court may order the wrongdoer to return any property wrongfully taken and also pay twice the value of the property under Probate Code section 859. In effect, this remedy can result in triple damages for the wrongdoing.

That remedy can change the entire case.

Probate Code section 859 is one of the strongest financial remedies available in inheritance disputes. It applies when someone has wrongfully taken, concealed, or disposed of property belonging to a trust, estate, elder, dependent adult, minor, or conservatee. The statute also applies to certain cases involving undue influence and financial elder abuse. Under the statute, the wrongdoer can be liable to return the wrongfully-taken or retained property and ordered to pay additional damages of twice the value of the property recovered.  The court may also award attorney’s fees and costs in its discretion.  

For beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and family members dealing with suspected inheritance theft, Probate Code section 859 can provide real leverage. But it is not automatic. The person bringing the claim must properly alleged that the property has been wrongfully taken or retained, prove the wrongful conduct, connect it to specific property, and show why the facts justify the penalty.

What Probate Code Section 859 Does

Probate Code section 859 is often used as a remedy in a petition filed under Probate Code section 850. A section 850 petition asks the probate court to determine who properly owns or has a claim to property and to order property returned to the correct trust, estate, or person. Section 859 adds the penalty when the property was taken, concealed, or disposed of under circumstances that meet the statutory standard.

In practical terms, the court may first order the wrongdoer to return the property or repay its value. Then, if section 859 applies, the court may order an additional amount equal to twice the value of the property recovered.

This can be a major financial consequence. For example, if a sibling wrongfully takes $300,000 from a trust account and the court finds that Probate Code section 859 applies, the exposure may be far greater than simply repaying the $300,000. Depending on the facts and the remedy awarded, the wrongdoer may also face double damages and possible attorney’s fees.

This is why section 859 claims often become the center of trust and estate litigation. The statute is meant to address serious misconduct, not ordinary family disagreements.

Common Situations Where Double Damages May Apply

Probate Code section 859 can apply in many types of inheritance theft cases. The most common examples include:

  • A trustee transfers trust money into a personal account.
  • A sibling uses a parent’s power of attorney to drain bank accounts.
  • A caregiver pressures an elder to sign over real estate.
  • A family member removes cash, jewelry, art, or other valuables from a home.
  • A trustee sells trust property and hides the proceeds.
  • A beneficiary conceals assets that should have been part of the estate.
  • A person causes an elder to transfer property through fraud, pressure, or financial abuse.

These cases often involve a pattern. The wrongdoer may start with access, then control, then secrecy. They may claim they were “helping” the elder, “borrowing” money, or acting under verbal permission. Sometimes those explanations are true. Many times, they are not.

The evidence matters. Courts look at documents, bank records, title records, communications, witness testimony, and the timing of transfers. A suspicious transaction may raise questions. A proven wrongful taking can support a claim for recovery. A bad faith taking, undue influence in bad faith, or financial elder abuse may support the double damages claim.

What Does “Bad Faith” Mean?

Bad faith is one of the key issues in many section 859 cases. The statute refers to a person who has “in bad faith wrongfully taken, concealed, or disposed of” covered property. It also refers to taking property through undue influence in bad faith.  

Bad faith generally means more than a mistake. It suggests intentional misconduct, dishonest purpose, or wrongful conduct done with knowledge that the person was not entitled to the property. A trustee who accidentally misclassifies an expense may have made an error. For example a trustee who secretly pays personal credit cards from trust funds may be acting in bad faith.

Other examples of facts that may support bad faith include:

  • Secret transfers made shortly before or after death.
  • False explanations about where money went.
  • Refusal to provide accountings or bank records.
  • Use of trust or estate assets for personal expenses.
  • Transfers to a person who isolated the elder from family.
  • Documents signed when the elder was dependent, confused, or afraid.
  • A pattern of hiding, delaying, or changing stories.

Bad faith is often proven through circumstantial evidence. Wrongdoers rarely admit they stole from a trust or estate. The case is usually built by showing the paper trail and explaining why the conduct does not match a good faith mistake.

Financial Elder Abuse and Undue Influence

Many inheritance theft cases involve older adults. California law recognizes financial elder abuse when someone takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains the property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, by undue influence, or by assisting another person in doing so. Probate Code section 859 expressly links to the financial elder abuse definition in Welfare and Institutions Code section 15610.30.  

Undue influence cases can be especially difficult because the wrongdoer may argue that the elder “wanted” to make the transfer. The question is often whether the elder’s free will was overcome. Courts may examine isolation, dependency, vulnerability, pressure, secrecy, and whether the transaction was fair. These claims should be pleaded and proven carefully. A strong case should not rely on labels alone. It should show exactly what was taken, how it was taken, who benefited, and why the conduct meets the standard for double damages.

What Beneficiaries Should Do If They Suspect Inheritance Theft

If you believe trust or estate assets were stolen, hidden, or misused, act quickly. Delay can make it harder to trace funds, preserve records, and stop further losses.

Start by gathering what you can: trust documents, wills, account statements, property records, letters from the trustee, and any communications about disputed transfers. Avoid making threats or emotional accusations that could distract from the evidence. The focus should be on proving what happened.

A trust litigation attorney can evaluate whether the case supports a section 850 claim to return the property, a section 859 double damages claim, a financial elder abuse claim, as well as a trustee removal petition, a surcharge claim, or another remedy. In many cases, several remedies may apply at the same time.

Holding Wrongdoers Accountable

Inheritance theft causes financial harm, but it also causes deep family damage. Beneficiaries often feel betrayed when a trustee, sibling, caregiver, or trusted advisor takes advantage of access to an elder, trust, or estate.

California law gives beneficiaries tools to fight back. Probate Code section 859 is one of the strongest. When someone wrongfully takes, hides, or disposes of trust or estate property, the court may do more than order repayment. In the right case, the court can make the wrongdoer pay once, twice, and even three times the total amount taken.

Trust Law Partners represents beneficiaries, heirs, and families in high-stakes trust and estate litigation involving trustee misconduct, financial elder abuse, undue influence, and inheritance theft. If you suspect that trust or estate assets were stolen or concealed, call Trust Law Partners at 833-878-7852 to discuss your legal options.

RECENT ARTICLES
  • No Privacy, No Protection:  Beware the Wise Old Sage on Your Screen

  • Inheriting a House With a Mortgage, Tax Lien, or Reverse Mortgage in California

  • Caregiver Transfers and Presumed Fraud: Understanding Probate Code Section 21380

  • What to Do If You Believe Your Conservatorship Is No Longer Justified

  • Is a Family Member Stealing From Your Aging Parent? What Pasadena Families Need to Know About Elder Financial Abuse

  • When a Power of Attorney and a Trust Conflict: Which Document Wins in California?

  • When Someone Changes an Elderly Parent's Trust at the End of Their Life: Undue Influence and Elder Financial Abuse in San Mateo

  • What Happens When an Estate or Trust Beneficiary in an Inherited House Refuses to Leave?

  • Endangered Estates – How to Tell if the Personal Representative Has Gone Rogue in Your California Probate Matter

  • Power of Attorney Abuse in California: Remedies for Successor Agents and Family Members

Safeguard Your Future with Professional Legal Support

Name(Required)
SMS Consent

OUR OFFICES

Locations

 

Pasadena
San Mateo
San Diego
Newport Beach
Santa Barbara
Dallas

Contact us to discuss
your case with our
trusted lawyers.

California probate law is one of the most intricate areas of state law, filled with technical procedures, filing deadlines, and evidentiary burdens. Without legal representation from a professional in this field, it’s easy to overlook key facts, waive important rights, or become entangled in long, frustrating legal processes.

Our California inheritance lawyers are not just familiar with California probate law—we’re immersed in it. We stay current on legal updates, case law trends, and judicial interpretations. We collaborate as a team to examine every angle of a case and develop the most strategic and effective approach for our clients.

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

 

Name(Required)
SMS Consent

  • About
  • Legal Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact
  • Search
Privacy Policy Sitemap Terms of Use